You might say
We don't have a say and we should
More Gripes some of which I will have touched on already.
Our roads and streets are atrocious, the constant road works and ineffective remedial work carried out by service organisations is not good enough.
Companies who dig up our roads should be liable to resurface the whole width of the road to a specific standard. Only resurfacing the area of workings is short sighted. Filling aged cracks, broken edges, potholes and relatively new sunken resurfacing works with inferior materials is unproductive, costly and ineffective as these replaced areas deteriorate, sometimes within weeks of repair.
Hounslow Highways must stop resurfacing main roads and highways that do not need immediate remedial work. Let us see the roads and streets outside our front doors resurfaced now!
Brentford regeneration has been a long time coming we can see by the current landscape around Brentford that many new buildings have appeared in the past 2 or 3 years.
Whilst accommodation has become the top priority and without question is desperately needed we must remember that infrastructure is the key to successful regeneration schemes.
With the influx of new families our schools, doctors, dentists, shops, public transport and of course the ability to park our own vehicles are at breaking point.
We must ensure that the regeneration of Brentford and all redevelopment within The boundaries of Hounslow start with a true view on infrastructure and has our communities at heart.
Local people must have a real say in how they will live now and in the foreseeable future, this means involving the community and taking notice of people who live in Brentford and Hounslow as a whole.
It is apparent that the government and the London Mayor are pushing local councils to provide more cycle lanes. This is a positive move for safety, but these cycle lanes must be used and cyclists must be held accountable when these cycle lanes are in place.
Hounslow should positively promote the cycling proficiency test and best practice.
The cyclist’s attitude of ‘perceived invincibility’ must be halted. In the main our highway code does not dictate; It advises cyclists to wear high visual Jackets and helmets (safety items) it does say when travelling at night a front and back light should be used (how many cyclists get stopped for riding without lighting) it also says it is ‘advisable’ (not compulsory) to use cycle tracks when provided.
As a frequent user of the (A4) The Great West Road I encounter cyclists travelling at much slower speeds holding up traffic and even more worrying swaying from side to side as well as undertaking and overtaking and cutting up vehicles in rush hour. One or two fingers are often put into the air at motor vehicle drivers, I do wonder what they mean! Riding at night without lighting on roads is just dangerous.
As a car driver, motorcyclist and PCV licence holder I passed 3 different driving tests to specific standards, motorised vehicles are taxed, insured and if over 3 years old must be MOT’d yearly but to ride a cycle you need the cost of the cycle (if that), is this fair or just blinkered institutionalised suicide.
Cyclists should be insured and hold some form of license to ride a roadworthy cycle. There should be a way of recognising offenders (riding on paths, riding through red lights, riding without care, overtaking at pedestrian crossings, riding on A roads when cycle lanes are provided, making rude gestures to the public when challenged about improper actions etc).
High visual tops with a dedicated registration to the person riding would allow a dedicated cyclist policing squad paid for by the introduction of a cyclist riding tax to bring offenders to justice.
The only way I can see this being introduced is by public demand.
I BELIEVE IT IS NEGLIGENCE BY THE POWERS THAT BE.
Legislation and enforcement is needed now, I believe the Government, London Mayor, local councillors and TFL should be proactive not reactive. In other words they must push for changes in the (out dated) Highway Code to bring cyclists in line with other road users. The attitude of many (not all) cyclists is deplorable.
Wearing lycra seems to change the cyclists mind set to superman status. Most cyclists ride with impunity, they are not required to take any riding qualification nor do they pay road fund licence or insurance and are not required to prove road worthiness of the cycle. The most dismaying thing of all is that they cannot be traced if they have caused an accident and ridden off.
Cyclists ride on the pavement without regard for pedestrians and off the pavement into traffic without regard, they undertake and overtake stationary vehicles and make erratic manoeuvres without signals or checking it is safe to proceed. They ride through people on pedestrian paving overtake stationary vehicles at all types of pedestrian crossings and through red traffic signals, but when their disregard for protocol and safety is pointed out they use foul signs and language. In the main they have a total disregard for other people. There are of course some cyclists who do abide by the rules of the road but these people are very much in the minority.
The Mayor of London has spent £Millions providing cycle lanes in London, many cycle lanes run alongside (off road) major roads (ie: the Great West Road) which are not used by all cyclists.
Legislation for "ALL" road users.
We only need to look back over the years, lighting(visibility), seat belts, tyre tread depth, crash helmets, engine capacity and MOT’S, licence plates (for recognition) and the driving licence were made compulsory. So why are cyclists exempt from all legislation? It has been suggested that because there are millions of cyclists who are potential voters that none of the major political parties want to lose these votes when it comes to elections. But what about all the other voters who abide by legislation.
Central government MUST legislate and dictate what cyclists should wear, what and where they can ride and how they behave, as well as some form of licensing, insurance and road worthiness. The Highway Code must dictate not offer guidelines.
TRANSPORT FOR LONDON (TFL)
Something many road users are unaware of.
TFL (Transport For London) must also come clean on why they alter traffic signal fazing. On many occasions this altering of traffic signal fazing creates major problems, causing huge traffic jams.
Is it all part of a greater scheme to make people ditch the car and use public transport. The only problem is that buses are slowed down by the same traffic problems and of course the dreaded cyclists.
The bandwagon for MP'S and the political leaders of London in the 70's and 80's was fast flowing traffic, the introduction of bus lanes was hailed as the way to get people out of the car and onto public transport.
Now the powers that be! find every way possible to slow traffic down IE; traffic signal re-fazing, cyclists in bus lanes, antiquated pedestrian crossings, widening of paths by restricting road widths being just a few ways to obstruct and make it difficult for car users.
The newest ploy by our local councils is the 20MPH being intoduced on our public roads, Hounslow Council has gone even further by closing public carparks and raising the fees on those few left in use.
Is Hounslow Council attempting to rid our public roads of local traffic users by design.
IE: To name but a few
1:Higher parking charges (when you can find a space)
2:Accomodation (New biulds) with nil parking or inadequate parking spaces.
3:Forcing through permit parking (CPZ) in many areas.
4:Not providing finances for the resurfacing of our residential roads.